<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Street View Japan Responds to Privacy Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newzjapan.com/google-japan/google-street-view-japan-responds-to-privacy-concerns/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newzjapan.com/google-japan/google-street-view-japan-responds-to-privacy-concerns</link>
	<description>Alternative News and Insider Commentary from Japan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://newzjapan.com/google-japan/google-street-view-japan-responds-to-privacy-concerns/comment-page-1#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newzjapan.com/?p=658#comment-710</guid>
		<description>I just want to add an update here. I published this post back on May 13th when I read it on a Google official site. Now I see a lot of posts in various places with the same title that says Google was &quot;forced&quot; to refilm all of Japan. I think this is grossly inaccurate. I really believe Google is trying to get the best shots it can, improve user experience, and keep a good relationship with the people of Japan. It can do all of this by refilming with a camera set 40cm lower. I haven&#039;t seen anything in Japanese or English that seems to emply that Google was in any way &quot;forced&quot; to do this. I think the use of the term &quot;forced&quot; is something akin to wishful thinking in some case, and in other cases, just blindly believing one site, while still others simply lack knowledge of Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to add an update here. I published this post back on May 13th when I read it on a Google official site. Now I see a lot of posts in various places with the same title that says Google was &#8220;forced&#8221; to refilm all of Japan. I think this is grossly inaccurate. I really believe Google is trying to get the best shots it can, improve user experience, and keep a good relationship with the people of Japan. It can do all of this by refilming with a camera set 40cm lower. I haven&#8217;t seen anything in Japanese or English that seems to emply that Google was in any way &#8220;forced&#8221; to do this. I think the use of the term &#8220;forced&#8221; is something akin to wishful thinking in some case, and in other cases, just blindly believing one site, while still others simply lack knowledge of Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

